Legal Opinion · Dissent
Sinram-Marnis Oil Co. v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 4, 1988Published
1DissentMurphy, P. J.
Plaintiff Sinram-Marnis (hereinafter Sinram) was the low bidder for a fuel supply contract offered by defendant City of New York. Accordingly, on June 21, 1983, the city notified Sinram of its intention to award it the contract. On June 26, 1983, however, before a formal award of the contract had been made, plaintiffs bid which had been irrevocable for the immediately proceeding 45-day "firm offer period”, became revocable. Also on June 26, the State Legislature enacted a new gross receipts tax (Tax Law § 300 et *369seq., as added by L 1983, ch 400, § 8) applicable to residential fuel suppliers,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Poel v. . Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Conduit & Foundation Corp. v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Fischbach & Moore, Inc. v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Manhattan & Queens Fuel Corp. v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Tufaro Transit Co. v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.