State v. Payton
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PER Cueiam.
Evidence vital to the State’s case against the defendant was elicited from the State’s witness in the absence of the jury. The court reporter relayed this evidence to the jury by reading her notes. Thus the story of the witness went to the jury as hearsay. The defendant was entitled to have the jury hear the story from the witness herself and to observe her demeanor at the time she told it. This was a fundamental right.
A review of the record fully discloses the difficult problem confronting the court by reason of the tender age of the witness and the excitement incident to her role…
2Cited by3 opinions
- State v. SpenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. HubertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963