Legal Opinion

Kravis v. Hock

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 21, 1947PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Case, Chief Justice.

The writ of certiorari brings up a determination by the Commissioner of Alcoholic Beverage Control that prosecutor was ineligible, under the provisions of title 33, chapter 1, Revised Statutes of 1937 (the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act), to hold a liquor license or to be employed by any liquor licensee. Cf. Kravis v. Driscoll, 134 N. J. L. 453.

The action by the Commissioner was more than the expression of an opinion. It was, we find, a ruling with the effect imputed to it above, following and in accord with an opinion or decision…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. McFadden's Lounge, Inc. v. DIV., ALCOHOLIC BEV. CONTROLNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  3. Galsworthy, Inc. v. HockNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  4. New Jersey Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control v. H & H Wine & Spirit Shop, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API