Legal Opinion

McConnell v. Kaufman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1892No. 514PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. Motion by appellant to amend his notice of appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Scott, J.

— This matter comes up on the motion of the appellant, the defendant below, for the purpose of amending his notice of appeal by adding thereto the words “to the supreme court.” A written notice was served upon the respondents, which, after being entitled and addressed to the respondents and their attorneys, reads as follows: “Take notice that D. Kaufmán, the defendant in the above entitled action, hereby appeals from the final judgment of the superior court of King county in said action rendered and entered in said action on December 12,1891,”…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Van De Vanter v. FlahertyWashington Supreme Court · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API