Legal Opinion

The W.T. Rawleigh Co. v. Langford

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 18, 1937PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In September, 1928, Plaintiff in Error entered into a contract with Defendant in Error, C. A. Langford, as principal and T. M. Cox and W. H.,Leonard as sureties, whereby the plaintiff in error agreed to sell to Langford certain manufactured goods known as Rawleigh Products at current wholesale prices, F. O. B. Memphis, Tennessee, the contract to run from date of execution' of December 31, 1929. Paragraph Five.of said contract was as follows.:

“5. It is mutually understood and agreed that this is a Contract of Buyer and Seller, and the Buyer is not the agent or representative of the Seller for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. LangfordSupreme Court of Florida · 1933

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Saglio v. Chrysler First Commercial Corp.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API