Dowling v. Prado Verde Ranch, Inc.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WATT, V.C.J.,
¶ 1 The sole issue before us is whether the Court of Civil Appeals holding that defendants, the two Prado Verde Ranch entities and Jerome Willis, had waived appellate review of three requested instructions relating to the statute of frauds because defendants had violated Rule 1.11(e)(1),1 Oklahoma Supreme Court Rules, by failing to set out those instructions "in totidem verbis" in their brief? We hold that defendants did not waive appellate review of those instructions under the circumstances presented by this appeal.
¶ 2 The relevant facts are few. The trial court refused…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Avard v. LemingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Baby Girl L.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Brennen v. AstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Hartley v. HerndonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2002
- S.C. v. J.L.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Brennen v. AstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.