Legal Opinion
Goldberg v. 400 East Ohio Condominium Ass'n
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided June 23, 1998No. 98 C 1615PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ASPEN, Chief Judge.
A less creative plaintiff, after observing that Illinois’s Condominium Property Act forbids condominium boards of managers from adopting any rule which “impair[s] any rights guaranteed by the First Amendment to the Constitution” and provides that any such rule is “void as against public policy and [is] ineffective,” 765 ILCS 605/18.4, 18.4(h) (West), would have brought suit under that law in state court after her condominium’s board enacted a rule which barred all “[c]an-vassing or distributing of materials to individual units” other than those…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hafer v. MeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Flagg Bros., Inc. v. BrooksSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kalian at Poconos, LLC. v. Saw Creek Estates Community Ass'nDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- Boucher v. 111 East Chestnut Condominium Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019
- Association of Beachhouse Owners of Kiahuna Plantation v. HamlishHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2008