Legal Opinion

Oprisko v. Royal Jobbers, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 22, 1990PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCasey, J.

Plaintiff commenced this action as a result of a slip and fall on a paved walkway located between a street in Broome County owned by defendant Village of Endicott and a retail store owned and operated by the remaining defendants. After discovery had been completed, plaintiff moved for a preference and defendants cross-moved for summary judgment. Supreme Court granted plaintiff’s motion and denied defendants’ cross motions.

Turning first to the appeal by the village, we conclude that its motion for summary judgment should have been granted. During her examination before trial, plaintiff fixed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Englehardt v. Town of HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. Schneid v. City of White PlainsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lesser v. Mayben Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. Van Wageningen v. City of IthacaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API