Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Bennett

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 2016No. 2015-2004PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Daniel Lee Bennett of Springfield, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0071965, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 2000. Relator, disciplinary counsel, has charged him with professional misconduct for, among other things, neglecting client matters, misusing his client trust account, and failing to cooperate in the ensuing disciplinary investigation. Based on the parties’ stipulations and Bennett’s testimony at a hearing before a three-member panel of the Board of Professional Conduct, the board found that he had engaged in some of the charged misconduct and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. OberholtzerOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. BrueggemanOhio Supreme Court · 2010

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. Halligan (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Dayton Bar Assn. v. Sullivan (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. Cheselka (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Columbus Bar Assn. v. Christensen and Kluesener (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Warren Cty. Bar Assn. v. Brenner (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API