Legal Opinion
United States v. Curreri
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided July 11, 1973No. Crim. 72-0433, 72-0434PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BLAIR, District Judge.
Defendants in the above-captioned cases, which have been informally combined for purposes of this motion, have moved to suppress evidence secured by the government through wiretaps obtained under the provisions of Title III
of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, 18 U.S.C. § 2510 et seq. ■ Based upon 18 U.S.C. § 1955, the indictments against defendants charge the conducting of a gambling operation in violation of state law, see Annotated Code of Maryland, Article 27, §§ 240 and 356, and are the result of a series of fruitful wiretap…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. CoxCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. John Jacob BoboCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Joseph E. Cafero A/K/A Ernie, in No. 72-1577 Appeal of Dominick Vinciguerra, A/K/A Dom, in No. 72-1578Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- United States v. KingDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1971
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. Bonifacio De La Fuente, Ronald Albert Cardenas, George Sierra, Pat Vargas,augie D. Sierra, and Robert StewartCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. ArmocidaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Evelio MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. ArmocidaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Michael PellicciCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.