Solar Electric Co.'s Appeal
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Schaffer,
This is a companion appeal to the Solar Electric Co.’s Appeal (No. 1), supra, page 156; in it the appellant sought to raise the question of the jurisdiction of the court below by petition under the Act of March 5, 1925, P. L. 23; it did not do so however until the case had proceeded to Anal hearing. The question of jurisdiction under this act must be raised preliminarily and therefore appellant’s petition' came too late: Wilson v. Garland, 287 Pa. 291. The course prescribed by the act must be pursued: Stamper v. Kogelschatz, 289 Pa. 94.
It follows that this…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Wilson v. GarlandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Stamper v. KogelschatzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
3Cited by5 opinions
- Solar Electric Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. BerkinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Gaitley's AdoptionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Helfstein v. Milikovsky, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1940
- Stokes v. Giarraputo & Son, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1941