Legal Opinion
Tallman v. Durussel
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided June 23, 1986No. 14234-8-IPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ringold, A.C.J.
Robert Durussel appeals a summary judgment holding him liable for principal and interest due on a promissory note payable to Burns Tallman. The facts are not in dispute.
Appellant Durussel entered into an agreement with respondent Tallman, to purchase 25 percent of the common stock of Tallman Machinery Company for $50,000. As part of this transaction, Durussel paid cash in the amount of $21,784.78 and on August 15, 1981, signed a promissory note in the sum of $28,215.22. Payments of $750 were to be made every month until the note was paid.
Seven months later, the corporation…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Southern Construction Co. v. PickardSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Columbia Plaza Corporation v. Security National BankCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- North Street Ass'n v. City of OlympiaWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- Welch v. Bancorp Management Advisors, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
- McGary v. Westlake InvestorsWashington Supreme Court · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Ellingstad v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
- Marine Enterprises, Inc. v. Security Pacific Trading Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1988
- Sardam v. MorfordCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
- Ellingstad v. STATE, DEPT. OF NAT. RES.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999
- Mellon v. Regional Trustee Services Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.