Legal Opinion

Lesser v. Lesser

The Superior Court of New York City

Decided January 15, 1895Published

Action to construe a will.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.

There is sufficient in the will to authorize the court to give it a judicial construction. The axiomatic rule is that effect must be given to each and every part of a will and to the testator’s intention, which, when ascertained, must control. That the testator intended his executrix might sell the realty is evidenced by these words :

“ I hereby consent to the partition, upon the consent of my executrix, Tillie Siegel, and sale of any and all realty in which I may have any hereditary interest; said interest being acquired from Leopold Siegel.”

Whatever realty the testator died possessed of was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stimson v. . VromanNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Dorland v. DorlandNew York Supreme Court · 1847
  3. Riker v. . LeoNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. Weeks v. WeeksThe Superior Court of New York City · 1885

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API