Legal Opinion

McGooden v. Bartholic

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 16, 1906No. Gen. No. 4,622Published

Bill in equity. Error to the Circuit Court of Grundy county; the Hon. Samuel C. Stough, Judge, presiding.

1Per curiam

On petition for a rehearing plaintiffs in error contend that the inability of cross-complainants to maintain a cross-bill to foreclose was not raised below. The cross-bill charged .that, cross-complainants owned an undivided one-fourth of the debt secured by the mortgage. The answer thereto denied that cross-complainants owned one-fourth or any other part of said debt. This sufficiently raised the point that under the proof the title to the note owned by Maria P. Bartholic at her death did not pass to her heirs. That the heirs at law did not take title to the personal estate and could not…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hickox v. FrankIllinois Supreme Court · 1882

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API