Samad v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GLICKMAN, Associate J:
Mateen Abdus. Samad appeals his convictions after a jury trial of voluntary manslaughter while armed and possession of a firearm during a crime of violence. Samad contends that the trial court plainly erred in failing to investigate reports that a juror had slept through critical parts of the government’s case-in-chief. Samad also complains of two evidentiary rulings at trial, one limiting his co-defendant’s cross-examination of the main prosecution witness about his activities as a drug dealer, and the other precluding Samad from introducing a redacted portion of his…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Tanner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Comber v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- United States v. DiazCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Lowery v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Hinton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Commonwealth v. DancyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
- People v. GonzalezAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
- Hankins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.