Legal Opinion

In re J. B. & J. M. Cornell Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 15, 1912PublishedCited by 11 opinions

In the matter of the J. B. & J. M. Cornell Company, bankrupt. On exceptions to report of special master determining priority of claims.

1Opinion of the Court

MAYER, District Judge.

By order of this court, dated June 9, 1911, it was provided:

“(1) That both of the bids of the New York Trust Company and Sarah K. Cornell, and of the bondholders of the bankrupt, both dated April 24, 1911, are accepted according to their respective terms and the conditions contained therein, and the receivers, the trustee, and the bankrupt ate hereby directed to convey, transfer, and deliver forthwith to the bidders or their assignee the property, real and personal, described in their respective bids, free and clear from all liens and incumbrances of any character by…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. National Surety Corp. v. SharpeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. American Engineering Co. v. Metropolitan By-Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
  3. Coriell v. Morris White, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  4. In Re Standard Gas & Electric Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1945
  5. Ball v. Improved Property Holding Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API