Legal Opinion
Dumas v. Marrero
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided January 9, 2004No. 5D03-2303PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
864 So.2d 531 (2004)
Eugene DUMAS, Jr., Petitioner,
v.
Theodore MARRERO, Jr., Respondent.
No. 5D03-2303.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
January 9, 2004.
Eugene Dumas, Jr., Bristol, Pro se.
No appearance for Respondent.
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
2Per curiam
Eugene Dumas, Jr., seeks a writ of mandamus to compel his appointed private attorney, Theodore Marrero, Jr., Esquire, to return various records, files and documents retained by Mr. Marrero at the conclusion of Mr. Dumas' criminal case. We originally denied relief in this case by order because mandamus does not lie to compel a private citizen…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Dowda and Fields, PA v. CobbDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Puckett v. GentryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Donahue v. VaughnDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Colon v. IrwinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Ramos v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
4Cited by6 opinions
- LaFlower v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Olivera-Herrera v. TaylorDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- SAFFERFIELD v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Aust v. GlazerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Capital Standard, LLC, Tchentsov v. US Bank National Association, Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I Trust 2005-AC9District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.