Legal Opinion

Folsom v. Folsom

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1919No. 15164PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Cross-appeals from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Allen, J., entered October 25, 1918, upon findings, awarding alimony in an action for divorce, after a trial on the merits.

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

The main question presented by this appeal is the adequacy of the alimony granted by the trial court. Briefly summarized, the property consisted, as to its separate character, of certain English railroad securities, possessed by Mrs. Folsom, adjudged by the trial court to be of the value of $5,000; and two hundred and twenty-eight shares of the Novelty Mill Company’s stock, valued by the court at $34,200, owned by George F. Folsom; all the rest, residue and remainder of the property was decreed by the trial court to be community property, consisting of the following:(1) Summer Home located in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Finn v. FinnWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Morgan v. MorganWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Webster v. WebsterWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Fields v. FieldsWashington Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re Binge's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Brown v. ScofieldWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  3. In Re the Estate of WitteWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Worthington v. WorthingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Lovejoy v. LovejoyWyoming Supreme Court · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API