Legal Opinion

Hudson v. . Morton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 16, 1913PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal by defendant from Coolce, J., at September Term, 1912, of StaNly.

1Opinion of the Court

Glare:, C. J.

Tbis is a controversy over one acre of -land formerly used as a scboolkouse lot and recently purchased by the plaintiffs as trustees of the Union Grove Baptist Church. There was a reference made to R. L. Smith and two others as referees, whose report was confirmed by the judge. The finding of facts approved by the judge are conclusive, if there is any evidence to support the finding that is excepted to. The only point presented is the exception by the defendants that the description in the deeds under which the plaintiffs claim title was too vague and indefinite to admit of parol…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Farmer v. . BattsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  2. Perry v. . ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Robertson v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  2. Dent v. English Mica Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  3. Norwood v. . TottenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Peel v. . CalaisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  5. Patton v. . SluderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API