Legal Opinion

Dawkins v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 20, 1988No. 86-218PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant Gerald T. Dawkins argues in this appeal that the trial court erred in not affording him a hearing on his motion to seal his arrest record. Because we find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to hold such a hearing, we affirm.

Metropolitan Police records show that on March 4, 1985, appellant assaulted Burton Farr, Jr., by holding a gun to Farr’s head and asking the whereabouts of his roommate, Fred Shegog, who had served a prison term for murdering appellant’s father. Appellant held Farr and another person at gunpoint while searching the apartment, and left…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. District of Columbia v. HudsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. In Re Estate of SoederOhio Court of Appeals · 1966

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mahaise v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. In Re Estate of WalkerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. White v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Rezvan v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Sepulveda-Hambor v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API