Legal Opinion
Kempinski v. Greene
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 7, 1960No. Civ. A. No. 28144PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARY, District Judge.
The matter is now before the Court on plaintiff’s and defendant’s cross motions for summary judgment. Originally scheduled for hearing in this action was a motion of the defendant to dismiss under Rule 12 or, in the alternative, motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.
After argument on the original motion, counsel for the defendant, the United States Attorney, requested permission to file a supplemental brief, which was granted. Attached to defendant’s original brief (Docket Paper No. 4) were several Exhibits, “A” to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Iselin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Eleanor Zirin v. E. A. McGinnes District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fillippo v. S. Bonaccurso & Sons, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
- Kempinski v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
- Stephen L. Kempinski v. J. J. Greene, Regional Operations Director, Post Office Department, 30th and Market Streets, Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961