Vaughn v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Oregon; Charles E. Wolverton, Judge. James P. Vaughn was convicted of interfering with and impeding the United States in the possession and use of certain property, and he brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff in error was convicted under an indictment which charged him under section 11 of the Act of March 21, 1918, known as the Federal Control Act (40 Stat. 457 [Comp. St. 1918, Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, § 3115%kJ), with willfully interfering with and impeding the United States in the possession and use of certain railroad property, consisting of certain described tools and material, the title to which had been vested in the United States by virtue of its assumption of the control of the Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Company and Southern Pacific…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Martin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
- Johnson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- State v. SchafferSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Charles Thomas Bryan and James Eston Echols. Appeal of Charles Thomas BryanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Charles Thomas Bryan and James Eston Echols. Appeal of Charles Thomas BryanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973