Legal Opinion

Brittian v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 12, 1923PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Clarke

Affirming.

Appellant complains of Ms conviction of the statutory crime of false swearing, because of the admission of incompetent evidence, the refusal of the -court to direct his acquittal, and the assumption in the instructions- that an essential fact, not proven, was true.

There is -presented, however, only the- question of whether or not the court erred prejudicially in permitting the Commonwealth to prove orally that the alleged false statements were made by defendant upon the trial of an -action then pending against him in the Williams-*462burg police court,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Goslin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905
  2. Partin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  3. Day v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  4. Biggerstaff v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1874
  5. Eureka Elkhorn Coal Co. v. LawsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Lair v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1960
  2. Miller v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  3. Eaves v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  4. Minniard and Turner v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  5. Clark v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API