Legal Opinion
United States v. Herbst
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided January 30, 2012No. 10-3867PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge.
Randall Allen Herbst appeals his conviction following a jury trial of one count of attempting to entice a minor to engage in illicit sexual activities, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b). Herbst claims the district court 1 erred in denying his motion to dismiss the indictment on Speedy Trial Act grounds, in refusing to give the jury an entrapment instruction, and in denying a post-judgment motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. He also asserts that there is insufficient evidence to support his conviction because there was no proof that he performed…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Mathews v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. MimsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- United States v. Johnelle BellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Joseph MaberyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Robert HensleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Frank WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Quotez PairCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.