Legal Opinion

STATE EX REL. STATE OF WASHINGTON v. Bozarth

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 23, 1986No. 7180; CA A38099PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

This is a proceeding for enforcement of child support under the Revised Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (1968) (RURESA), ORS 110.005 et seq, initiated in the State of Washington and transferred to the circuit court of Morrow County, Oregon. The circuit court dismissed the petition on its own initiative on the ground that the custodial parent in Washington allegedly had interfered with respondent’s visitation rights. The state appeals. The issue is whether interference with visitation rights is a defense to a proceeding under RURESA. We conclude that it is not. Therefore, we…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kramer v. KellySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. County of Clearwater, Minn. v. PetrashSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  3. Levell v. LevellOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Ibach v. IbachArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State Ex Rel. Hubbard v. HubbardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. GrenleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  2. Damico v. DamicoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API