M.H. v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Appellant claims the statute under which he was convicted, § 893.13(l)(i), Fla.Stat. (1991), prohibiting the sale of controlled substances within 200 feet of a “public housing facility,” is unconstitutionally vague, violates his federal and state rights to due process and equal protection, and amounts to an invalid exercise of police power. In Williams v. State, 618 So.2d 323 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993), this court rejected such claims. Accord Turner v. State, 615 So.2d 819 (Fla. 1st DCA), review granted, 621 So.2d 433 (Fla.1993); Brown v. State, 610 So.2d 1356 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); contra State v.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- State v. ThomasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Turner v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
3Cited by1 opinion
- M.H. v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1994