Legal Opinion

M.H. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 27, 1993No. 92-1449PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Appellant claims the statute under which he was convicted, § 893.13(l)(i), Fla.Stat. (1991), prohibiting the sale of controlled substances within 200 feet of a “public housing facility,” is unconstitutionally vague, violates his federal and state rights to due process and equal protection, and amounts to an invalid exercise of police power. In Williams v. State, 618 So.2d 323 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993), this court rejected such claims. Accord Turner v. State, 615 So.2d 819 (Fla. 1st DCA), review granted, 621 So.2d 433 (Fla.1993); Brown v. State, 610 So.2d 1356 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); contra State v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  2. State v. ThomasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  3. Turner v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  4. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. M.H. v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API