Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Clifton v. City of Daytona Beach

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 16, 1935Published

1Opinion of the CourtBuford, J.

This is the second appearance of this case in this Court. See State, ex rel. Ona Mary Clifton, etc., v. City of Daytona Beach, et al., 114 Fla. 384, 154 Sou. 165. At that time the writ of error was dismissed because it was not taken nor applied to a final judgment. Pursuant to the suggestion contained in the last paragraph of the opinion, on the mandate going down, the relator amended the alternative writ. On alternative writ being issued, a return was filed, also demurrer and motion to quash. The demurrer and motion to quash admitted the allegations well pleaded in the alternative writ.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Clifton v. City of Daytona BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API