Legal Opinion

United States v. Hernandez-Amparan

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided February 5, 2009No. 3:08-mj-01931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

KATHLEEN CARDONE, District Judge.

On this date, the Court considered Defendant Alfonso Hernandez-Amparan’s “Motion to Dismiss for Delay” (“Motion”) (Doc. No. 29); “Government’s Response to Motion to Dismiss for Delay in Evaluating Defendant’s Competency” (“Response”) (Doc. No. 33); and “Defendant’s Reply to Government’s Response to Defendant’s Speedy Trial Motion to Dismiss” (“Reply”) (Doc. No. 35). For the reasons set forth herein, Defendant’s Motion is hereby GRANTED, and Defendant’s Indictment (Doc. No. 8) is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

I. BACKGROUND

On June 24, 2008, Defendant…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Henderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. Joseph John RussoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  4. United States v. James MayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. James E. Howard, United States of America v. Berry L. PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Joshua ConlanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
  2. United States v. DellingerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2013
  3. United States v. BealsDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API