Legal Opinion

Nance Ex Rel. Nance v. Westside Hospital

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1988Published

1Opinion

OPINION ON PETITION TO REHEAR

FONES, Justice.

The health care defendants have filed a petition to rehear.

Their first complaint is that the Court decided the case on “the basis of a novel ground that had not been briefed, argued or even mentioned by any of the litigants.”

We readily acknowledge that the words of the statute that we interpreted as excluding worker’s compensation as a collateral source, to-wit: “and such losses are not replaced or indemnified in whole or in part,” had not been mentioned, or construed by the litigants or the courts below.

In construing a statute, it is the duty of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. LorenzettiSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Tennessee Growers, Inc. v. KingTennessee Supreme Court · 1984
  3. City of Memphis v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Union, Local 1288Tennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  4. United Canners, Inc. v. KingTennessee Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Royal Indemnity Co. v. SchmidTennessee Supreme Court · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API