Legal Opinion

Opinion No. (1979)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Decided September 21, 1979Published

1Opinion of the Court

Dear Director Edmison,

The Attorney General has received your letter wherein you ask, in effect, the following question:

Does 82 O.S. 934(1) (1974) require that federal grant monies disbursedunder 33 U.S.C.A. 1288 first pass through the Pollution ControlCoordinating Board before being distributed to the various sub-stateplanning districts designated to conduct area-wide water qualitymanagement planning?

As you have noted in your letter, certain sub-state planning districts (A.C.O.G., I.N.C.O.G., and ARKHOMA Regional Planning Commission) have been designated by the Governor pursuant to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Webb v. City of HugoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API