Legal Opinion

Donahue v. Hebert

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 14, 1978No. 77-888PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

355 So.2d 1264 (1978)

Richard V. DONAHUE, Appellant,

v.

Howard N. HEBERT, Appellee.

No. 77-888.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 14, 1978.

William H. Harrell, of Reinman, Harrell & Silberhorn, Melbourne, for appellant.

William C. Potter, of Nabors, Potter, McClelland & Griffith, Melbourne, for appellee.

DOWNEY, Judge.

Appellant seeks review by interlocutory appeal of an order denying his objections to interrogatories directed to him in a libel suit. Such an order in an action formerly cognizable at law is not reviewable by interlocutory appeal, but we will treat the matter as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. International Union of Operating Engineers v. LassitterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  2. Lassitter v. WaltonSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
  3. Tallahassee Democrat, Inc. v. PogueDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  4. Gamer v. KeenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tennant v. CharltonSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  2. Citibank, N.A. v. PlapingerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  3. Charlton v. TennantDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  4. Broward County v. KerrDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  5. Puga v. Suave Shoe Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API