Legal Opinion
State v. Jaroma
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided August 7, 1986No. 85-368PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrock, J.
This is an interlocutory appeal from the Trial Court’s {Bean, J.) ruling denying the defendant’s motion to suppress. See Sup. Ct. R. 8. At issue is the legality of a police search of a Goffstown storage garage that led to the defendant’s arrest and charges of receiving stolen property, RSA 637:7, and burglary, RSA 635:1. We affirm.
On July 21, 1984, the chief of the Epsom Police Department received a telephone call from a Marc Eaton and went to Eaton’s home to investigate the latter’s claim that the defendant had been harassing Eaton’s wife by telephone. The chief stated at the motion hearing…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- United States v. Albert M. LefkowitzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- State v. SandsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. DiazSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. CaneloSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
- State v. StearnsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
- State v. BradberrySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
- State v. KennisonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.