Legal Opinion

Horrman v. Neuman

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided January 15, 1896PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from order denying motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtConlan, J.

Appeal from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

It appears from the printed case that after the jury had retired to deliberate one of the number sent by an officer in charge two questions to the court asking further information on matters involved in the case.

The court indorsed on the paper containing the questions : “That he had no further charge to make than as already charged,” and caused it to he returned to the jury. This was in the absence of counsel, and it is claimed on the part of the ' appellant that this was an error for which the judgment should be reversed.

We do not think…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Watertown Bank and Loan Co. v. . MixNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Taylor v. BetsfordNew York Supreme Court · 1816
  3. High v. ChickNew York Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. The People v. BrothersIllinois Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API