Legal Opinion

Bank of Holden v. Bank of Warrensburg

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 18, 2000No. WD 57405PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, Judge.

This appeal involves two separate security interests, one held by the Bank of Holden and the other by the Bank of Warrensburg, in the same cattle. At issue is the timeliness of the Bank of Warrens-burg’s filing to perfect its security interest in the cattle. The question boils down to whether or not § 1.040, RSMo.19941, Missouri’s time computation statute, applies to the Uniform Commercial Code as adopted in this state.

I. FACTS

The facts in this case are uncontested. Charles and Kathy Wall (the “Borrowers”) secured a loan from the Bank of Warrens-burg…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Heights v. Citizens National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Kubota Tractor Corp. v. Citizens & Southern National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  4. United States v. Central Livestock Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1985
  5. Banque Worms v. Davis Const. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rubloff CB MacHesney, LLC v. World Novelties, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  2. Morris v. Karl Bissinger, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Nacha Rene v. Royal City Bell, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2024
  4. Rubloff Machinery v. World NoveltiesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API