Legal Opinion

Ross v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 21, 2002No. A02A0663PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Barnes, Judge.

Matthew Ross III appeals his convictions of cocaine possession with intent to distribute, firearm possession by a convicted felon, and firearm possession in the commission of a felony, contending the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence seized during a traffic stop. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

If the evidence presented in a motion to suppress hearing is uncontroverted and no question regarding the credibility of witnesses is presented, the trial court’s application of the law to undisputed facts is subject to de novo appellate review. Vansant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Vansant v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  2. Brantley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1988
  4. Moody v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  5. Ridgeway v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ross v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  2. State v. HamdanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Boone v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  4. Lindsey v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
  5. Wright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API