Warder, Bushnell & Glessner Co. v. Willyard
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from a judgment (of $73.95) of the district court for Bock county, where the action (an appeal from justice’s court on questions of law alone) was tried by Perkins, J.
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
This was an action originally brought in justice’s court, to recover the sum of $40 alleged to have .become due on November 1, 1889, as an instalment of the agreed price of a harvest*532ing-machine sold and delivered by plaintiffs to defendant. The latter, by his answer, admitted the sale and delivery, but averred that, in accordance with the terms therewith, he executed and delivered to the plaintiffs his three negotiable promissory notes, each payable-to their order, aggregating in amount the stipulated price of the-machine; one of the same being for $40, maturing November 2, 1889, and having…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Matteson v. EllsworthWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
- Robinson v. ReedSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
- Croswell v. LabreeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1888
- Milbery v. StorerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1883
- Russell v. ReedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
3Cited by8 opinions
- Columbia Grocery Co. v. MarshallTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
- McCormack Harvesting Machine Co. v. BlairMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
- Maguire v. EichmeierSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- O. N. Bull Remedy Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Bank of Lauderdale v. ColeMississippi Supreme Court · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.