Legal Opinion

Kokjohn v. Harrington

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 26, 1995No. 93-1858PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The beneficiaries of decedent’s will challenge a declaratory ruling finding a golden passbook account was not part of decedent’s estate because it was held in joint tenancy by *100the decedent, Paul A. Kokjohn, and his sister, Marguerite Harrington. They contend: (1) the “time deposit, open account agreement” is not incorporated by reference on the signature card; (2) the parol evidence rule does not apply to exclude consideration of evidence extrinsic to the signature card and the “time deposit, open account agreement”; (3) decedent did not intend to create a joint tenancy account; and (4) if…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Batter Building Materials Co. v. KirschnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  2. OBS Co., Inc. v. Pace Const. Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1990
  3. Porter v. Iowa Power and Light CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  4. Wilson v. WilsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  5. County of Jefferson v. Barton-Douglas Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Northrop Grumman Information Technology, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  2. Matter of Estate of KokjohnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
  3. Jerry D. Longfellow Vs. Hal SaylerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API