Legal Opinion

Lee v. Kelley

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 20, 2017No. 17-1840PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

About five hours before Ledell Lee’s scheduled execution, two appeals were brought to this court. In the first, the district court determined that, under Gonzalez v. Crosby, 545 U.S. 524, 125 S.Ct. 2641, 162 L.Ed.2d 480 (2005), it lacked jurisdiction on the ground that Lee’s motion for relief from judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) was, in substance, a successive petition for habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The district court concluded that, although Lee’s motion was styled as one to reopen judgment under Rule 60(b), Lee was actually seeking to litigate new claims…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Burton v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Hill v. McDonoughSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Williams v. KelleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API