Legal Opinion

Stanwade Metal Products, Inc. v. Heintzelman

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 6, 2004No. 2003-T-0039PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judith A. Christley, Judge.

{¶ 1} Appellant, Stephen D. Heintzelman, appeals from a judgment entry of the Trumbull County Court of Common Pleas granting partial summary judgment in favor of appellee, Stanwade Metal Products, Inc. (“Stanwade”). For the following reasons, we affirm the decision of the trial court.

{¶ 2} Stanwade is a corporation located in Hartford, Ohio, and is a manufacturer of steel tanks and other petroleum-related equipment. Heintzelman is a self-employed general construction contractor based in Findlay, Ohio. Over the years, Heintzelman has operated his business under the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Turner v. TurnerOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Leibreich v. A.J. Refrigeration, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Shamrock v. Cobra Resources, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
  2. Capital One Bank (USA), NA v. ReeseOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. DeFoe v. Schoen Builders, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. BAC Home Loans Serving, L.P. v. VanjoOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Johnson v. Clark Cty. Aud.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API