Legal Opinion

Woods v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1939No. 33695PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffith, J.

Appellant was indicted and convicted under the charge of the burglary of a dwelling house. The undisputed proof showed that the house in question, although intended for a dwelling house, had been only recently erected and had not yet been occupied as a dwelling. It was vacant.

Appellant relies on Haynes v. State, 180 Miss. 291, 177 So. 360, wherein the court held that a house from which the occupants had permanently removed on the day before the night of the burglary was not a dwelling at the time of the commission of the alleged crime; and that proof of the burglary of such a house would not…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. SowellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
  2. Haynes v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Blumenberg v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Swan v. Liverpool, London & Globe InsuranceMississippi Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Anderson v. Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Edwards v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Gillum v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Nathan v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. ThornhillMississippi Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Jones v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1973

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API