Legal Opinion

Estate of Berry v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 3, 1967No. Nos. 16781, 16782PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The only issue presented in this case is whether or not the Tax Court was right in determining that $440,000 of the $1,683,237.77 profit made by petitioners-appellants on the sale of the Raleigh Hotel in Washington, D. C. constituted gross income1 for Federal income tax purposes rather than a capital gain. Estate of Betty Berry v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 43 T.C. 723 (1965); Raleigh Properties Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 21 CCH Tax Ct. Mem. 812 (1962).

The Tax Court reviewed the transaction in detail. It noted particularly the inclusion in the final sale documents of a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. Court Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Berry v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1965

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Estate of Betty Berry, Deceased, Louis Berry, Louis Berry, Surviving Spouse v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Lcg Trust No. 2, A. R. Glancy, Jr., Successor Trustee, Successor Trustee v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API