Legal Opinion

State of West Virginia v. J.C.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 2019No. 17-0713PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHISON, Justice:

*102 In the instant case, the circuit court found a juvenile accused of delinquency not competent to proceed. "It is a fundamental guaranty of due process that a defendant cannot be tried or convicted for a crime while he or she is mentally incompetent." Syl. Pt. 5, in part, State v. Hatfield , 186 W.Va. 507 , 413 S.E.2d 162 (1991). The Legislature has adopted various statutes to allow adult criminal defendants to be evaluated and treated for competency. The Legislature has rightly and vigorously protected this fundamental right for adult criminal defendants. The same cannot be…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. State v. HatfieldWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. CarterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Tynes v. ShoreWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re R.V.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2022
  2. State of West Virginia v. Andrew Wayne MillerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API