Legal Opinion

Michael v. Isom

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 1, 1914No. 5082PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from County Court, Cleveland County; P. B. Swank, Judge. Replevin by R. A. Isom against L. B. Iiigbee, wherein J. M. Michael intervened and was made a party defendant. Judgment for plaintiff, and intervener brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBleakmore, J.

This 'is an action in replevin instituted in the county court of Cleveland county by the defendant in error, R. A. Isom, as plaintiff, against the defendant in error, L. B. Higbee, as defendant. The plaintiff in error, J. M. Michael, in tervened and was made a party defendant. A joint judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff below against the defendant L. B. Higbee and the said J. M. Michael. Motion of the said J. M. Michael for a new trial was overruled on the 9th day of December, 1912, and he was allowed an extension of 60 days’ time within which to prepare and serve a case-made.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. National Surety Co. v. Oklahoma Presbyterian College for GirlsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Strawn v. BradySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Grounds v. DingmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Martin v. MilnorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Long v. BeardenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Mann v. MannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API