Legal Opinion
Mandel v. Board of County Commissioners
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided March 31, 1965No. [No. 236, September Term, 1964.]PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOppenheimer, J.
The appellants contend that a change in the zoning regulations enacted while litigation in respect of the use of the appellants’ properties under the former regulations was pending was illegally passed and violated their constitutional rights. Consideration of the issues involved requires a statement of the nature and status of the litigation which was pending when the change was enacted and the manner in which the regulations were changed.
Mr. & Mrs. Julius Mandel, and Homer Gudelsky, trading as The Gudelsky Company (the Mandéis), are the owners of a 376-acre tract of land situated on the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Wakefield v. KraftCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- BOARD OF CTY. COMMISSIONERS OF PRICE GEORGE v. Oak Hill FarmsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
- Yorkdale Corp. v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- Albert v. Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
- Trustees of McDonogh Educational Fund & Institute v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Hyson v. Montgomery County CouncilCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Prince George's County v. BlumbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Rockville Fuel and Feed Co. v. City of GaithersburgCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
- Public Service Commission v. Hahn Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- Ross v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.