Legal Opinion

Case v. Hermitage Cotton Mills

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 14, 1960No. 17646PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Legge. Justice.

Employer and carrier appeal from a circuit court order affirming the Industrial Commission’s award in favor of the claimant, Hattie Mae Case. It is undisputed that no claim on her behalf was filed with the Commission within one year after the accident as required by Section 72-303 of the 1952 Code. The Commission’s award and the order affirming it rest upon the finding that the employer was estopped to invoke that statute. The primary question for our determination is whether such finding has any factual support in the record before us.

Section 72-303 reads as follows:

“The right…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Young v. Sonoco Products Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
  2. Poole v. E. I. duPont de Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
  3. King v. WesnerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
  4. Gold v. MoragneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
  5. Hoke v. Cherokee CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Case v. Hermitage Cotton MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  2. Skipper v. Marlowe Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  3. Goff v. MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  4. Lovell v. C. A. Timbes, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1974
  5. Altman v. Williams Furniture Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API