Hormuth Drywall & Painting Service, Inc. v. Erectioneers, Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Lowdermilk, J.
Plaintiff-appellant Hormuth Drywall & Painting Service, Inc. (Hormuth) appeals after the Vanderburgh Superior Court granted judgment on the evidence in favor of defendants-appellees Niehaus Industrial Sales Company (Niehaus) and Bucyrus-Erie Company (Bucyrus).
We affirm.
FACTS
Bucyrus owned a factory building and contracted with Niehaus for certain improvements to be made to the building. Neihaus subcontracted to Erectioneers, Inc. Erectioneers subcontracted to Hormuth.
The president of Hormuth had numerous conversations with represen tatives of Bucyrus and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Urbanational Developers, Inc. v. Shamrock Engineering, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1978
- Aldon Builders, Inc. v. KurlandIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
- Spickelmier Industries, Inc. v. PassanderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
3Cited by9 opinions
- State Exchange Bank of Culver v. TeagueIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- State Board of Tax Commissioners v. South Shore MarinaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Large v. GregoryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Elkhart County Farm Bureau Cooperative Ass'n v. HochstetlerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Bahre v. METROPOLITAN SCH. DIST., ETC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.