Legal Opinion

United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of Air Comfort, Inc., and Cross-Defendant v. Jones Coal Company, and Cross-Plaintiff

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 10, 1964No. 15517Published

1Per curiam

This appeal is from a judgment for the plaintiff in an action under the Miller Act to collect the balance due on a contract to install air-conditioning in the United States Courthouse at Chattanooga, Tennessee. The defendant filed a counterclaim for damages. The District Judge adopted findings of fact and conclusions of law. In the appeal, only factual issues were raised. In our opinion, the findings of fact of the District Judge are not clearly erroneous and there is no merit in the appeal.

The motion to remand for dismissal is overruled. The motion filed by the plaintiff to add additional…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of Air Comfort, Inc., and Cross-Defendant v. Jones Coal Company, and Cross-PlaintiffCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
  2. United States v. James William AllenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API