Legal Opinion

Brothe v. Zaiss

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 2, 1947No. 15,538PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Alter

Anna Brothe Zaiss brought an action in the district court to foreclose a mortgage, and named Maude Brothe, personally, and as administratrix of the estate of Charles Brothe, deceased, Clara Brothe Epple, Minnie Brothe Guthner, Louise Brothe Benham, and Margaret Brothe Goody defendants. Subsequently Wm. Epple and Wm. Epple, Jr., were substituted for Clara Brothe Epple as a defendant. Trial to the court resulted in a decree in favor of plaintiff, to reverse which Maude Brothe, individually and as administratrix, has sued out this writ of error.

We will hereinafter refer to Anna Brothe Zaiss,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Grover v. CloverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1917
  2. Denison v. JeromeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  3. Norris v. BradshawSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932
  4. Weaver v. DuganSupreme Court of Colorado · 1936

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gentile v. GentileSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
  2. Gentile v. GentileSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
  3. Hoff v. ArmbrusterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
  4. Hoff v. ArmbrusterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API