Wiernasiciwicz v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Per curiam
From a judgment upon a verdict finding appellant guilty of manufacturing intoxicating liquor (Acts 1923 p. 70, §1), this appeal was prosecuted and in this court appellant has assigned as errors the overruling of his motion to quash the affidavit and the overruling of his 'motion for a new trial.
Appellee earnestly, insists that appellant has failed to comply with Rules 3 and 22 of the Supreme and Appellate Courts, and for that reason he has not presented any question for review.
An examination of the record discloses no attempt to make marginal notes to the first thirty-nine pages of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kaufman v. AlexanderIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Earl v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1926
- Dillon v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
- Epstein v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1920
- Pattison v. Grant Trust, Etc., Co., Admr.Indiana Supreme Court · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.