Legal Opinion
In Re James
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided January 30, 2004No. 00-15864(GMB), 03-13458(GMB)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GLORIA M. BURNS, Bankruptcy Judge.
The present motions are before the Court on two factually distinct, but legally related issues. Debtor Michael James (“James”) and Debtor Phyllis Allen (“Allen”) (collectively, the “Debtors”), both contend that there is no equity in their residences to which the State of New Jersey Motor Vehicle Commission (the “NJ MVC”) liens may attach. Additionally, Debtors contend that if equity permitting attachment exists, Debtors may exempt the equity under 11 U.S.C. § 522(d)(1). Debtors seek to avoid the liens under 11 U.S.C. § 522(f)(1)(A) because…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re AsheCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Gardner v. Commonwealth Of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- In re BleaseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Jay Graffen Cass Graffen v. City of Philadelphia, Jay & Cass GraffenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- In Re FennellyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re: Tracey L. SchickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- In Re AdellUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2005
- In Re: SchickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Myers v. U.S. Bank National Bank AssociationDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2023